Healthcare employees
Enterprise learning environment at Erlanger.
LEARNING TECHNOLOGY · SYSTEMS · PERFORMANCE
I’m Thomas Reynolds. I connect learning, technology, data, operations, and people to solve larger organizational problems.
Chattanooga, Tennessee / Open to remote opportunities
Instructional design, practical performance support, and meaningful learning experiences.
EXPERIENCE AT SCALE
Complex environments. Practical delivery.
Enterprise learning environment at Erlanger.
Previously roughly 2–6 hours for the analysis discussed.
Approximate before / after observations at NASA.
Thunderbird’s 1:1 Chromebook transformation.
Approximate, retrospective figures from my professional portfolio. Each result describes a specific project; observed changes are not controlled causal estimates.
SELECTED WORK / THE EVIDENCE
I bring the systems perspective and the hands-on skills to connect strategy with day-to-day execution.
LMS administration and modernization in an environment supporting roughly 12,000 employees. Connecting learner experience, compliance workflows, platform governance, and reporting.
Make an enterprise learning environment usable for learners and useful to the teams responsible for training and compliance.
Totara configuration, learner workflows, user access and permissions, course administration, vendor coordination, and technical escalation. I helped evaluate an LMS/vendor relationship exceeding $1 million and an RFP examining alternatives including Cornerstone and Absorb.
A practical connection between business requirements, platform decisions, and the people who depend on the system. Moving specialized support closer to L&D reduced handoffs, with some routine requests addressed in approximately 5–10 minutes. Platform evaluation is distinct from hands-on administration.
Recurring leadership analysis · bars use the 6-hour upper bound
Structured reporting and dashboarding reduced some recurring leadership analysis from roughly 2–6 hours to under 10 minutes.
Executive-facing learning reporting, data analysis, and dashboarding in an enterprise healthcare environment. The time comparison refers to the recurring analysis discussed in my portfolio, not every report.
The ability to translate learning data into a clearer picture of training activity, compliance needs, and opportunities for improvement.
Approximate retrospective times. The after bar shows a 10-minute upper bound; actual review time was reported as under 10 minutes.
Observed correct sorting · 0–100% scale
Recycling education redesigned around practical decisions, examples, and memory aids. Field observations several months later indicated improved correct sorting.
Regulation-heavy training was not translating into the everyday decisions employees needed to make.
Translated scientific and regulatory concepts into practical, behavior-focused instruction for audiences with varying technical knowledge.
Observed correct sorting moved from approximately 25% before the redesign to approximately 70% several months afterward—a change of about 45 percentage points. These were field observations, not a controlled experiment.
A 1:1 Chromebook rollout connecting technology selection, policy, faculty preparation, instructional practice, and ongoing support.
Balanced instructional needs with budget constraints, choosing a practical Chromebook option when pen-enabled devices cost approximately three times as much.
Prepared staff through training, communication, and classroom support. Devices enabled collaborative work, digital peer review, HyperDocs, and field learning.
Removing dependence on one computer lab helped reduce standardized-testing logistics from roughly 4–5 days to about half a day. The program later supported the transition to remote learning.
Mentored a junior colleague by gradually transferring knowledge, authority, and decision-making responsibility until he could operate more independently.
Develop understanding of the work, create space for decisions, and transfer real responsibility—not just tasks.
A colleague who could contribute independently and bring strengths different from my own. The goal was sustainable team capability.
HOW I THINK
Training is one possible answer. First, I look at the knowledge, workflow, resources, and expectations behind a performance gap.
“I connect learning, technology, data, operations, and people to solve larger organizational problems.”
Understand the performance gap and the conditions around it.
Bring the right people, systems, and evidence into the conversation.
Translate needs into practical learning, workflows, and support.
Use reporting and feedback to guide the next decision.
WHERE I CAN CONTRIBUTE
Select the challenge your team is hiring for.
For teams that need a leader who understands learning strategy, platform decisions, data, and organizational change.
Learning Technology Manager · Learning Systems Leader · Learning Operations Manager
TOOLS & PRACTICE
Hands-on learning platforms, content development, and reporting experience. Practical AI evaluation complements this foundation.
HOW I WORK WITH PEOPLE
Clear expectations, accountability, and room for people to make decisions, ask questions, and learn.
Listen across functions. Combine the perspectives of technology, operations, data, and the people doing the work.
Understand why the work matters and how it improves the organization or the experience of the people it serves.
My experience is practical: stakeholder analysis, communication, readiness, training, adoption, reinforcement, and adjustment based on feedback. A permissions rollout taught me to test legitimate user needs, pilot changes, communicate clearly, and maintain an escalation path.
I do not hold a Prosci Change Management Certification.
LET’S START A CONVERSATION
Tell me what you have in mind and how to reach you. I’ll review your request and follow up directly.
THOMAS REYNOLDS / YOUR NEXT TEAMMATE
Learning technology. Enterprise systems.
People who can put both to work.